Pug Yoga iPhone Case - New Release

Our iPhone Slim Case combines premium protection with brilliant design. The slim profile keeps your tech looking sleek, while guarding against scuffs and scratches. Just snap it onto the case and you’re good to go.Extremely slim profile, One-piece build: flexible plastic hard case, Open button form for direct access to device features, Impact resistant, Easy snap on and off, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, and X cases support QI wireless charging (case doesn’t need to be removed).

Schroeder says that she never received the message and that 111 people is hardly a representative sample of the neighborhood, which has a population of about 4,000. What's more, a Verizon-only text isn't fair to residents who aren't the carrier's customers. They won't benefit from the antennas, but they still have to live with them. When Schroeder sent a complaint letter to the FCC, Verizon called the complaint "unfounded" and said she'd chosen to opt out of marketing texts via a setting on her phone, a claim she disputes.

"It's like they think they can be sloppy and do a substandard job and there's nothing we can do about it, she says, "We're here to say, 'Yes, we can do something about it.'"Flato says it's common for Verizon to send such texts when seeking approvals for new wireless facilities, "Residents who oppose new wireless infrastructure projects tend to be quite vocal and typically participate in hearings and community meetings," she said in an email, "On the other hand, customers who are in favor of improved service and infrastructure deployment tend not to voice their opinions unless they are asked, We find it's helpful to survey our customers so we pug yoga iphone case can demonstrate community support when going through the permitting process with local jurisdictions."Attend one of ONAG's weekly meetings and it's clear the group is getting attention, At an August gathering, more than 25 people showed up to express their opposition to the antennas, Two candidates for the Oakland City Council district that covers Oakmore have addressed the group, but none has so far taken a public stance for or against the small cells..

Not everyone in the area is rallying to the cause, though. For instance, Dr. Myles Lampenfeld, Cathey's across-the-street neighbor and a recently retired radiation oncologist, isn't openly advocating for the antennas, but he doesn't see a disadvantage to them. He feels, he says, like a tiny voice in the wilderness. A Verizon customer, Lampenfeld's first thought when he heard about the antennas was that they'd improve his occasionally spotty service. He doesn't know a lot about 5G, but he's eager to use it once it arrives.

Cellular antenna equipment crowds a utility pole located in another part of Oakland, "I understand that it's about better reception and more functions," he says, "If everything is stepping up to 5G, it's important for users to be stepping up."Lampenfeld is skeptical of the arguments used to oppose the antennas, He's says the neighborhood's beauty is already marred by electrical wires strung between the utility poles and that new antennas won't make things worse, He's also not convinced that exposure to wireless signals could be unhealthy, "It's no more dangerous than anything we do in the course of our daily lives ., crossing the street, using our microwave oven, breathing exhaust fumes from vehicles driving by," he pug yoga iphone case says, "It's not been proven to cause cancer, It might, but you can say might about a lot of things." (See CNET's related story on wireless emissions and health.)..

An FCC warning on the pole shows a "No on 5G" protest sticker. Schroeder says she's not against better cell service but there's a cost to the 5G leap. If Verizon can design sleek antennas and ensure her that the technology is safe, she'll be happy. Cities can evaluate an antenna's design when approving an application, but they're barred from considering the safety of wireless signals under the 1996 Telecommunications Act. 'I know I can't fight things about the health issues, because the FCC has handcuffed us," she says. "I'm not affected by property values because I'm not moving. .. My bigger issue personally is I don't it want to be David vs. Goliath."Cathey agrees. "Verizon doesn't have to make [the antennas] look ugly," he says. "And I don't think Verizon or the FCC is looking out for me. They haven't done the research to show that if one of these things is outside my house, it's safe."Verizon says all its antenna equipment complies with FCC standards for wireless signal emissions, and the company disputes the idea that small cells in a neighborhood lower property values. In an information brochure it distributed to some Oakmore residents -- carriers are required to notify all residents living within 300 feet of a proposed antenna location -- it cited a RootMetrics study that said reliable mobile service was more important than schools to potential home buyers.

As a company that tests wireless signals for carriers, RootMetrics has an interest in promoting better wireless coverage, Other studies, like one from the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy, have suggested that buyers will pay less for a home near an antenna, (The median price of an Oakmore home is just under $1 million, according to data from Zillow.), But David Stark, the pug yoga iphone case public affairs director of the Bay East Association of Realtors, is dubious, "I've never heard of an impact of a cell tower on a property's value," he says, "It could become more of an issue in the future, but there are much bigger factors to consider, especially in an area [like Oakland] where multiple offers on a house are common."Oakmore's hilly geography can make for spotty wireless service, Verizon says its new antennas will improve reception..

If carriers get their way with small cells, it may one day be hard to find a home that's not near an antenna. For now, though, ONAG is pressing ahead with its fight. The neighborhood is dotted with yard signs the group distributed that protest the antennas, and members continue to lobby city officials. Until the city's planning commission holds a hearing on the Oakmore antennas, ONAG is taking its fight to other Oakland neighborhoods. Schroeder says the goal is to avoid any charge of NIMBYism or "not in my backyard." She'd love it if Verizon bypasses Oakmore, but not if it means Verizon just adds the antennas in another area nearby.

"For anything we do, we don't want to represent it as us versus another part of Oakland, We have to represent all of Oakland," she says, "Each pole counts, so we'll fight every pole."So far, ONAG has had a few successes, At a planning commission meeting in late September, commissioners referred an antenna approval in another part of Oakland to the full city pug yoga iphone case council after ONAG members spoke during the public forum, For Schroeder, that's enough to keep her motivated, even if the proposed antenna near her home eventually goes in, And when AT&T or T-Mobile come knocking with their own antenna plans, she knows she'll have to start the process again..



Recent Posts